“`html
The European Union is considering a military mission to fill the gap left by the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, whose mandate expires at the end of 2026. The proposed three-year operation would aim to strengthen Lebanese armed forces and security services through training and advisory support, rather than serving as a direct replacement for UNIFIL, the nearly 50-year-old UN presence in the region.
Experts warn that a potential power vacuum could create significant strategic opportunities for Israel. Lebanese political scientist Imad Salamey noted that without international supervision, Israel might push Lebanon’s military into more direct coordination with Israeli forces, fundamentally altering the region’s diplomatic architecture from multilateral oversight to bilateral arrangements. Such shifts could become difficult to reverse once established.
Any European deployment faces substantial challenges. Analysts suggest Israel is unlikely to modify its military posture or withdraw from Lebanese territory simply because of a new international presence. One researcher who served with UNIFIL predicted Europe might eventually establish a new demarcation line, effectively formalizing territorial divisions rather than resolving underlying conflicts.
The UN is also exploring alternative arrangements, including a scaled-down peacekeeping force with between 900 and 3,000 personnel, compared to UNIFIL’s current 7,000 troops. Meanwhile, ongoing US-mediated talks between Israel and Lebanon have yielded limited results in curtailing Israeli military operations or occupation of Lebanese land.
“`
Originally reported by Aljazeera →
About the Author
